Current Size: 100%
Changes in Heart Failure Drug Utilization During 1999: The Canadian CHF Clinics Network Experience
Publication Type:
Journal ArticleAuthors:
J. Malcolm O. Arnold; John D. Parker; Jonathan G. Howlett; Andrew P. Ignaszewski; Stuart J. Smith; Wlodzimierz Czarnecki; Marie-Helene Leblanc; Peter Liu, A. Reuben J. Rajakumar; Israel Belenkie; Dante ManyariSource:
J Am Coll Cardiol, Volume 37, Issue 2, p.197A. (2001)Abstract:
Background: The Canadian CHF Clinics Network was
established to improve the current management of CHF, to
implement new proven strategies in a timely manner, and to
monitor treatment trends in 11 initial centres across Canada. The
first formal meeting of the Network members was in July 1998
when, through consensus, a manual of CHF management for
physicians, nurses, and patients was developed.
Methods: A computerized database was designed and
implemented in Jan 1999 and 883 patients were seen and had their
data entered in the first 12 months. These patients represent
both new patients to the clinic and some previously seen in the
clinic but who were being entered into the longitudinal database
for the first time.
Results: Selected mean baseline characteristics of these
patients were: age 64 years; male 72%; ischemic aetiology 62%;
NYHA Class I 13.0%, II 34.8%, III 40.8%, IV 11.4%; LVEF 24%. Drug
utilization changed from the first to the last quarter of 1999
with an increase in ramipril (27.1 vs 10.3%, p<0.0001) while
all ACE-I use remained constant (70.3%), and spironolactone (31.8
vs 5.0%, p<0.0001). Beta blocker use was 39.9% but showed a
nonsignificant increase to 44.7% (carvedilol 22.4%, metoprolol
20.6%). Furosemide and digoxin use remained unchanged at 69.4 vs
73.4% and 50.0 vs 50.5% respectively. The physician-patient
interaction resulted in a change of drug treatment in 46% of
encounters and education regarding medication in 46%, CHF 42%,
fluid/salt 42%, home weight monitoring 42%, and exercise 27%
respectively.
Conclusion: Several important major clinical trials were
presented or published in 1998/99 including HOPE, RALES, CIBIS-2,
MERIT-HF, and BEST. The impact of these trials was rapidly
assimilated into clinical practice. The clinics emphasized the
importance of patient education of their disease, their
medications and early warning signs of worsening heart failure.
Assessment of clinical outcomes is being prospectively captured
within the Network database. While national utilization of the
same medications in general medical practice over the same time
period is not available at this time, the data support the role
of such clinics in translating clinical trials into clinical
practice.